| Author | Message | |
| CAFPdxORPosts: 34Location: Join Date: March 9, 2008 9:17 AMSend Message | With his strikeout in the first inning tonight (with a RISP, I might add) David Wright is now hitting under .200 in the month of July, with 2, count-em, 2, RBI's. A month ago, when Beltran joined Reyes and Delgado on the DL, it was obvious the Mets needed Wright's production more than anytime else. And the sad truth is, David Wright didn't just disappoint, he absolutely disappeared. Is this the guy the Mets should be building their team around? | |
| HoJo20Posts: 161Location: Join Date: September 18, 2008 12:58 PMSend Message | CAFPdxOR you got to understand this kid does not have any protection and the last part is that he is trying to hard to keep this team from sinking further into disappoint. We have actually reach that part but remember this, wright always had protection when he came up in this league and showed power and even showed some great moves on the field. Now he knows that he is the only one that seems to put the team on his shoulder and seems to be putting to much pressure on himself. Maine and Wright wear their frustration on their sleaves and that sometimes can back fire on the field. These guys do have heart and won't back down even if they are playing terrible. Wright needs 2 to 3 days off to get his head back on track but Manuel won't do that because he still needs his bat in the line up. If you mentioned the word Wright in the line up you still think of power and base hits. He might not be doing that this year due to the staduim and the way he wants to change his swing. I think its more to do with the staduim than anything else. He will eventually adjust and become the player we all know he can be. | |
| captain-crunchPosts: 597Location: Join Date: November 29, 2007 7:37 PMSend Message | HoJo20 wrote:
Link
Valid points HoJo, I read in the wall street journal a few weeks back that the Mets are strongly considering bringing the fences in for 2010. Most notably rightcenter having the biggest adjustment in distance. As I mentioned several times before, this team needs to now focus on bringing up some top prospects who they feel are ready and see what they got. I didn't like the fact that Jeremy Reed is playing most of the games in LF since Sheffield's injury. Nick Evans should be getting some at bats as well, so the organization can see if this kid could be part of the future. I like Reed, but let's face it, his ceiling is most likely at it's highest and he is a quality backup player. Murphy has been playing much better at 1st base over the last few weeks, now he needs to get into a groove at the plate. Bottom line, in today's baseball world; a couple of signings, a couple of trades and a couple of young prospects added to this team and the Mets will be back next season competing for the NL crown.CAFPdxOR you got to understand this kid does not have any protection and the last part is that he is trying to hard to keep this team from sinking further into disappoint. We have actually reach that part but remember this, wright always had protection when he came up in this league and showed power and even showed some great moves on the field. Now he knows that he is the only one that seems to put the team on his shoulder and seems to be putting to much pressure on himself. Maine and Wright wear their frustration on their sleaves and that sometimes can back fire on the field. These guys do have heart and won't back down even if they are playing terrible. Wright needs 2 to 3 days off to get his head back on track but Manuel won't do that because he still needs his bat in the line up. If you mentioned the word Wright in the line up you still think of power and base hits. He might not be doing that this year due to the staduim and the way he wants to change his swing. I think its more to do with the staduim than anything else. He will eventually adjust and become the player we all know he can be. | |
| HoJo20Posts: 161Location: Join Date: September 18, 2008 12:58 PMSend Message | I think its time to change the core and the only player i would keep right now is Wright. I am really not a fan of him but the truth is he is a player that all kids should look up. He plays with heart and passion and give it all he has to keep this team from failing. He might not hit home-runs or bring in RBIs like he use too but at least he tries in this sport. You see that all these guys only care about 1 think and thats status not the word team. You think Beltran or Delgado would bunt to push over a player from 2nd to 3rd that would be wrong for them. We need to bring up some younger guys and see if they are the future. I also would start putting out some of our guys names like Reyes, Tatis, Sheffield, and Schneiter as well so we can at least get something back in return. But reyes i would ask for 3 prospects and 2 of them would either be a pitcher/relief pitcher that is ready to play in the big leagues. | |
| captain-crunchPosts: 597Location: Join Date: November 29, 2007 7:37 PMSend Message | HoJo20 wrote:
Link
I'm sure you will see some players (mentioned above) being moved before the deadline. The Giants are looking for a 2nd baseman, which they tried to get Freddie Sanchez, but were unsuccessful. How about offering Castillo and cash for 2 AA prospects by the names of Brock Bond (2nd baseman) and Waldis Joaquin (RHP). Neither are in the Giants top 10 prospects, but are in their top 20. Sheffield could be dealt to an AL team, along with Hernandez, Schneider and Tatis. Not sure if all will be traded, but a couple probably would. As for Reyes, if the Mets have decided that they need to break up the core and Reyes is the most logical choice, They don't need to rush. I would bet my last dollar that you will not see Reyes traded during this season. In the off season, once the Mets have seen many of their young players perform this season; they will make many decisions and Reyes could be one of them. You can go either direction regarding what type of players you would want in return. Established players or top prospects, who have a high ceiling. Either way, the Mets better be careful (if they decide to trade Reyes) and get the best possible value for him. Back in 1978, the Mets rushed and traded away Tom Seaver to the Reds for Henderson, Zachery, Flynn and switch hitting OF whose name escapes me. That trade set them back, where it should had started a building process that would had made the Mets a better team down the road. I think its time to change the core and the only player i would keep right now is Wright. I am really not a fan of him but the truth is he is a player that all kids should look up. He plays with heart and passion and give it all he has to keep this team from failing. He might not hit home-runs or bring in RBIs like he use too but at least he tries in this sport. You see that all these guys only care about 1 think and thats status not the word team. You think Beltran or Delgado would bunt to push over a player from 2nd to 3rd that would be wrong for them. We need to bring up some younger guys and see if they are the future. I also would start putting out some of our guys names like Reyes, Tatis, Sheffield, and Schneiter as well so we can at least get something back in return. But reyes i would ask for 3 prospects and 2 of them would either be a pitcher/relief pitcher that is ready to play in the big leagues. | |
| metsfan4everPosts: 760Location: Join Date: December 1, 2007 10:35 AMSend Message | Your point is well taken. Trading Reyes could be a chance to make the team better down the road but there is much risk. If those prospects turn into a Hanley Ramirez, you're in great shape. If they turn into duds, the team will look much like the current team does with no injured players coming back. Trading a player of Reyes" potential is a franchise make or break move. I wouldn't do it unless an overwhelming offer showed up. Find a more important player entering his prime that's making anywhere near what Reyes is making. Noone focuses on the reasonable salary this guy makes. Think Castillo makes more money. By the way, Castillo is hitting near .300 with an OBP near .400. When are fans going to recognize that he is not our problem. O'dog is better but Castillo ain't bad. O'dog will make more money and cost a 1st round pick if we were lucky enough to get him. There are too many holes to look for incremental improvement there at the cost of a 1st rounder. By the way, I think that last players name was Dan Norman. | |
| OUTATOWNERPosts: 172Location: Join Date: May 15, 2008 6:02 PMSend Message | No pressure Castillo does well - when we needed him to hit and the pressure is on he choked. | |
| metsfan4everPosts: 760Location: Join Date: December 1, 2007 10:35 AMSend Message | One dropped pop in Yankee Stadium aside, Castillo has given us everything we could have hoped for. His error was a physical error, not due to lack of hustle, heart or effort. If you don't like the guy, that's your privelege. Personally, he's never been a favorite of mine either. I can appreciate how he ahs played. Seems most on this board will never forgive him for not giving up his contract so we could sign O'dog. Answer this. Who was the last second baseman we had who hit .300 with an OBP of .400? If you find an answer, I'll bet it's a great player in Mets history. The season has fallen apart but not everyone has underperformed. | |
| metsfan4everPosts: 760Location: Join Date: December 1, 2007 10:35 AMSend Message | CAFPdxOR wrote:
Link
With his strikeout in the first inning tonight (with a RISP, I might add) David Wright is now hitting under .200 in the month of July, with 2, count-em, 2, RBI's. A month ago, when Beltran joined Reyes and Delgado on the DL, it was obvious the Mets needed Wright's production more than anytime else. And the sad truth is, David Wright didn't just disappoint, he absolutely disappeared. Is this the guy the Mets should be building their team around? I am a staunch David Wright fan. Think he's a fine player and a rare exemplary role model for our kids in this steroid, HGH and amphetemine laced game. Having said that, I must admit that he tends to be more streaky than most stars. I'd still take his .300 plus BA and 100 plus RBI's anyday. Always hustles. Always fighting. I know how often he doesn't deliver in the clutch. Wonder how many acknowledge how often he does. Remember he has no lineup at all around him. He's pressing. Trying to do too much and getting nothing to hit. Remeber, he didn't disappoint when we had a big league lineup around him. | |
| WestCoastMetFanPosts: 621Location: Join Date: November 30, 2007 2:52 PMSend Message | metsfan4ever wrote:
Link
I am a staunch David Wright fan. Think he's a fine player and a rare exemplary role model for our kids in this steroid, HGH and amphetemine laced game. Having said that, I must admit that he tends to be more streaky than most stars. I'd still take his .300 plus BA and 100 plus RBI's anyday. Always hustles. Always fighting. I know how often he doesn't deliver in the clutch. Wonder how many acknowledge how often he does. Remember he has no lineup at all around him. He's pressing. Trying to do too much and getting nothing to hit. Remeber, he didn't disappoint when we had a big league lineup around him.
I agree and could not have said it better. |