Topic: Tanya should go
| Author | Message | |
| fsxPosts: 1Location: Join Date: December 14, 2007 8:42 PMSend Message |  December 14, 2007 8:54 PM | |
| moozimirPosts: 11Location: Join Date: December 19, 2007 10:00 PMSend Message | December 19, 2007 10:01 PM | |
| EpeefencerPosts: 10Location: Join Date: December 20, 2007 11:17 AMSend Message | December 20, 2007 1:04 PM | |
| fencer891Posts: 10Location: Join Date: January 6, 2008 12:18 AMSend Message | January 6, 2008 12:21 AM Epeefencer wrote:
Link
Tanya, whats up with those outfits? BTW, who was that little kid from Jericho who almost beat Carson? Is he really only in 7th grade? OMG!
his name is eric basille. pretty sure that's how how you spell his last name not sure | |
| afencer123Posts: 15Location: Join Date: January 3, 2008 7:11 PMSend Message | January 15, 2008 9:10 PM ..............????? what past... this lady cant ref.. Id like to see them give her a ref test and see how well she does!!!!
We lost becuse of this lady..... its really sad. She gives points to the pple who yell louder | |
| TeleFoilPosts: 44Location: Join Date: January 12, 2008 7:48 PMSend Message | January 19, 2008 6:08 PM Maybe we need max limit Tanya can direct a single team. Say 2 matches per season. But, seriously. It's ashame that a great match between two teams can be put inot question because of bad directing. Personally, maybe a touch here and there. But, I'll never say a Director gave a team the win or "cost us the match". For one thing that's a hell of an accusation. Plus, a good or great team will find another way to win. Don't just fence the other team. Fence the director too. for example: If it's 4-4 in sabre Tanya will not make the call on a double hit. Ain't a gonna happen. One light it people. It's that simple. May not seem right and fair, but, so is life in the real world; get used to it. It's more apparent this year because there is no true breakout team in either boys ot girls nassau fencing. I was looking at the numbers and with some extrapolations, because not every coach phones in the results to newsday, ex: GC boys have fenced 3 times this year according to the posted results. but, I digress. The girls side may end up with the top 5 teams all 7-3. Imagine that. Being on the road for the qtr finals with 7 wins. The boys side looks just as close. Maybe 2 matches at most between the #5 and #1 seeds. Playoffs should be very interesting.
I kinda ranted on there. what was this post about again? | |
| L_AuslanderPosts: 2Location: Join Date: January 20, 2008 7:28 PMSend Message | January 20, 2008 10:02 PM afencer123 wrote:
Link
..............????? what past... this lady cant ref.. Id like to see them give her a ref test and see how well she does!!!! We lost becuse of this lady..... its really sad. She gives points to the pple who yell louder Trust me, she doesn't do that. She gives points to who she likes, not who yells louder. | |
| TeleFoilPosts: 44Location: Join Date: January 12, 2008 7:48 PMSend Message | January 21, 2008 3:25 AM L_Auslander wrote:
Link
Trust me, she doesn't do that. She gives points to who she likes, not who yells louder.
unless she likes the people that are yelling louder. | |
| BlazerballPosts: 6Location: Join Date: January 22, 2008 1:22 PMSend Message | January 22, 2008 1:26 PM It was upsetting that at one meet, on more than one occassion, she asked for the score during the bout, then made a decision on the touch. | |
| razztazzPosts: 15Location: Join Date: January 8, 2008 11:33 PMSend Message | January 23, 2008 10:39 PM come on guys Tanya is not bad at all... that would be too good for her...shes HORRIBLE, just horrible wen i hav her as referee, she always seems to hav a blank look on her face like shes never seen fencing b4 and just pulls out random points for either fencer.
| |
| J4YS1ZZLEPosts: 2Location: Join Date: January 28, 2008 10:07 PMSend Message | January 28, 2008 10:09 PM | |
| agoldfe100@aol.comPosts: 6Location: Join Date: December 8, 2007 8:02 AMSend Message | January 29, 2008 9:08 AM i generally do not complain about officials(i umpire baseball games),the job is basically no win and thankless. however i did find it unconcerting that this women would have conversations with certain fencers and there families during matches. additionally the matches that i witnessed,this official did not watch the fencers,her eyes were only on the scoreboard(lights). i am not a fencer(my son is)so i do not know if this is correct procedure.
in baseball the rule is you always keep your eyes on the ball. | |
| TeleFoilPosts: 44Location: Join Date: January 12, 2008 7:48 PMSend Message | January 29, 2008 2:23 PM agoldfe100@aol.com wrote:
Link
i generally do not complain about officials(i umpire baseball games),the job is basically no win and thankless.however i did find it unconcerting that this women would have conversations with certain fencers and there families during matches.additionally the matches that i witnessed,this official did not watch the fencers,her eyes were only on the scoreboard(lights).i am not a fencer(my son is)so i do not know if this is correct procedure. in baseball the rule is you always keep your eyes on the ball. Don;t look at the lights!! Is what coaches always yell at the kids. the machine is there to support the director's call not make the call. The call should be gauged by the action. Then look at the lights to see if the call is suppoorted. In fact, it is permissable for a director to award a touch even if the machine does not go off, I think. I have seen that happen. Exceptionally rare though. |
The best thing is to develop a machine that will only register one touch!! Take all the guess work out. haha
Or develop a way for the lame's to glow where they are hit. eh. I don't know. It's 330 am. I abstain.